After
delving into plays for a year last year, I thought another Shakespeare would
have been enough for me this year. However, this particular play has interested
me since my last year plays event: Coriolanus, so when The Classics Club announced
January to be Shakespeare theme of our Twelve Month of Classics Literature, I
instantly decided to give it a try. Historical-tragedy has been my most
successful theme of Shakespeare, and although Julius Caesar
and Antony and Cleopatra are much more famous, Coriolanus turns out to be
another gem from the Bard!
The play
depicted a Roman general named Caius Marcius, who lived in around 5th
century BC. While he was fighting against the Volscians in Corioli, the
plebeian were lamenting about grain price which was at that time controlled by
the senate. They put the blame on Marcius, and hated him for that. Things were
getting worse because Marcius faced the plebeian in an openly contemptuous
manner.
While he was
not good in social life, Marcius was highly successful in his military campaigns. He
won the Volscian battle very bravely, where Cominius—his commander—gave him the
name of Coriolanus: the conqueror of Corioli. With the win, he also won
Senate’s respect and appreciation, and they supported him to run for consul. However the
tribunes: Sicinius and Brutus provoked the citizens to oppose it. Being under-pressured,
Coriolanus was enraged and insulted the people. He was banished from Rome, and finally
decided to join his enemy, Tullus Aufidius of the Volscians, to retaliate
against his own country.
Coriolanus
is a typical portrait of the patrician-plebeian conflict, which is still
relevant in any country in any era. I read in Sparknotes analysis, that
Shakespeare may have gotten the inspiration for the plot from the actual
conflict between King James and the Parliament in England’s early 17th
century, the time when Shakespeare wrote this play.
Coriolanus
was perhaps a great military commander, but he was far from a good state leader
(consul); he even had contempt for plebeian or the common people. So I think this
is not a pure tragedy, because it was Coriolanus himself who made the
circumstances against him. His fall was caused by his pride and ambition; he failed
to gain people’s respect, and he was blinded by his ambition for revenge that he
could not detect Aufidius’ betrayal.
The play is
very engaging; the plot is flowing nicely, the stage arrangement is very good and
helps us to learn the actual situations. The war is very lively, but most of
all, the speeches are very strong! Although a secondary character, Volumnia—Coriolanus’
mother—is an influential figure in Coriolanus’ decisions. Her speeches are so
noble, touching and inspiring. Even Coriolanus was very moved by his mother’s
speech, that he changed his mind about destroying Rome. His anger was replaced
by tears under her mother’s words.
This time
Shakespeare is succeeded in controlling my emotion to the play’s climax, and I
finally found a new favorite play. Five stars for Coriolanus!
~~~~~~~~~
I read e-book from Feedbooks.com
This book is counted as:
66th book for The Classics Club Project