Confession:
I have been dreading reading Jane Austen since I took The Classics Club project. Why? Because I regarded her books as chicklit—or chicklit in 18th
century style if you like. Basically, romance is never my favorite genre, unless
it’s only an added touch to a much serious topic. So, when I joined Jenna’s Austen in August, I was really gambling; I didn’t know what I was about to
read, and even was not sure whether I would finish it. But at least, I said to
myself, I would be able to say in the end of the event, that I have tried. So,
I picked Sense and Sensibility, more
because it was the lightest of all. I have tried once to read Pride and Prejudice, but could not get
through more than one chapter.
Sense and Sensibility is more or less a
character analysis of the society around 17th century, where Austen
lived. In particular, it’s about Elinor and Marianne Dashwood—the sense and the
sensibility. The sisters are from middle class family, and in age to find a
husband—like any girls of their age in that century. Austen brought us to see
the different approach of both sisters in trying to secure their love lives. Elinor—strong
and reserved—used more of her logic than emotion; while Marianne—expressive and
emotional—used her emotion more than logic. They were both so different, but they
loved and took care of each other so well. Elinor fell in love with the simple
and shy Edward Ferrars, while Marianne was attracted to the handsome and
flamboyant Willoughby. Everyone but Elinor was deceived by both men’s manners.
I think you would guess the end of both men, although—as usual—there will be
twists before all ended up, quite predictably.
Of the two,
I think I prefer Elinor; maybe because I am more like her than Marianne. Elinor
could see things deeper, and could separate the essential from the trivial.
While Marianne, who only saw the outer appearance or things on the surface,
were often deceived. I think Elinor’s qualities made her tougher, the qualities
I like from a woman and a friend. Expressive person like Marianne is used to
bore and tire me; and they are often more vulnerable too.
Beyond the
sisters, I also learned about different types of people in the society, which
Austen satirized cleverly in this book. Her idea to portrait how people treated
marriage as merely business, was very witty, but I think her style was rather
flat and boring. The first half was almost nonsense that I seriously thought to
dump it. But, fortunately, I refused to give up, as someone said that it will
pick up if I keep staying with it. And it was.
In the end,
what did I get? Not much. I can say now that I have read Jane Austen at least
one book, but beyond that, I am at the same stage as before. I do not like her
book. Period. And I think it would be the end of it. I don’t despise her; it’s
just that her style does not fit my taste.
Three stars
for Sense and Sensibility.
~~~~~~~~~~
I read e-book from feedbooks dot com
This book is counted
as:
77th book for The Classics Club Project
76th book for 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die
Don't feel bad. I have read Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility. I didn't like them. After these experiences, I have to admit that I don't like Jane Austen's books. I just don't like romance. Even well-written romance. All the men in Austen's novels are handsome or ugly; poor or attractively wealthy. The mothers are super gossipy which reminds me so much of a soap opera. Sense and Sensibility actually irritated me because I wanted to hit Marianne upside the head. Such a whiny girl. Elinor was definitely a better character. I am glad I am no the only woman on the planet who doesn't swoon when reading about the handsome men in Austen's books.
ReplyDeleteOh...and I thought I am the only one who didn't like Austen! And you're right about Marianne; I am curious, did a character like hers really exist in that era?
DeleteMarianne's exist in all times, as do Elinor's, Lizzie's and Jane's and Lydia's. JA was such an astute observer of human character that you feel like you know her characters. I also believe that JA improves with rereads - although it sounds like you won't be trying this theory out!!
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry that you've decided you're not a JA fan - at least you tried. We all have our stumbling blocks in the world of classics. I don't see why everyone raves about Hemingway or Catch 22 or more recently, Goldfinch!
But that's the wonderful thing about books - there's a book, a style, a genre for everyone. The trick is to find yours :-)
I hope you enjoy your next classic more.
Haha...probably you're right about Marianne, the kind of woman who always annoys me. You're right about JA as an observer of human character, but so do many writers are. What I complain here is her style in expressing her observation; it is too simple, and (that's why) often boring.
DeleteI agree about the stumbling blocks in the world of classics. I haven't read Catch 22, but I think at least Hemingway is great in The Old Man and the Sea. But again....it's all about which books fit us more. :)