Poirot
reunites with Hastings after their last adventure The Big Four (review to be following). They are enjoying a peaceful
holiday in a Cornish resort (or so they thought), and Poirot is (again) on a
sabbatical phase - declaring that his latest case would be his last, and to rouse
his interest would be impossible (he acted this in a couple of times in the
past, and this one isn't the last!) When mocked by Hastings, he then admitted
that if a bullet should struck the wall near them, then it would be difficult
to say no, as he's still a human being after all. Curiously, just then a pebble
struck the terrace where they are sitting.
Nick
Buckley, a young girl who lives in a house nearby, called End House, walked in
and joined them, and found that there's a hole in her hat. You would, no doubt,
guess what has really occurred - that the pebble is in fact a bullet, and that
someone has shot Nick, but missed only an inch of her head. And so, this case
was opened, quite unusually, without a corpse.
Nick's life
is clearly in danger. But surprisingly, the missing shot was not the only
attempt made against her. She has escaped three accidents before, each of which
would have killed her. This news alerted Poirot, and he acted immediately to
save Mademoiselle and to solve the case. His first instruction is that Nick
(who lives alone in the house, being an orphan) should invite her cousin Maggie
to stay with her. Poirot then runs his usual investigating method - talking
with all the suspects (Nick's friends, cousin, neighbors, and household), checking
on alibis. But from the beginning one thing is missing: the motive! There seems
no apparent motive of killing Nick. Poirot employed his grey cells to produce a
list of all "participant" involved in the case, but there's always a
missing link.
In the meantime,
another attempt was made, and this time one life has been sacrificed -
Maggie's, not Nick's! Poirot bitterly cursed and blamed himself of his
impotence to avoid death, and still... he failed to complete the puzzle. He
evacuated Nick to a hospital, and cut off communication from anyone, and yet,
Nick got poisoned from eating a chocolate. So, Poirot took an unprecedented
step. He falsely pronounced that Nick is dead. Now that the murderer thinks
he/she has achieved his/her goal, something is bound to come up to light, which
would reveal something about the murderer.
And, yes!
The X factor finally became clear - but not before a dramatic "play"
produced by Poirot (a stan which he would use in latter cases), a deception,
and one of the best plot twists from Agatha Christie, after the one in The Murder of Roger of Ackroyd.
Compared to
many of Christie's works, Peril at End House is unique in some ways. It begins
without a murder, only an attempt. Thus the detective could interview not only
the suspects, but also the "victim". People involved in the case are
not of a family, but mostly young people of Nick's circle, and Nick's cousin.
So there's a youthful freshness about the scenes that reminds you that it
happens in the jazz age. And it often made Poirot and Hastings felt old! :)
Lastly, there is only one murder, yet five attempts have been made to one
person without avail. Five!
This was
certainly a reread for me, because I vaguely remember about the hole in the hat
thing, however I was surprised that this has not been one of my favorite from
Agatha Christie! The plot is interesting, yes, and if you are clever enough,
you might have suspected something fishy from my last sentence on previous
paragraph! However what interested me more is the psychological aspect. Poirot
observed that since the crime has been committed very boldly, the motives must
be unobvious. This is a conclusion from someone who understands much of crime
psychology. It would be very interesting to analyze how the murderer must have
thought and felt - before making the decision and on executing it.
In short,
it's a unique story from Christie, and I loved it!
Rating: 5 to
5
Thank you for this review! I have this book on the shelf but have not gotten around to reading it. Now I will put in my reading stack!
ReplyDeleteHi Rick, thank YOU for stopping by and commenting here.
DeleteYes, this one is a hidden gem. I still don't understand why people praise Murder on the Orient Express that high. But again... it's about taste.