Saint Joan: Final Review

There are so many plays I had wanted to read for this last freebie month of Let’s Read Plays; but at the end I picked George Bernard Shaw’s Saint Joan. And what a perfect choice I’ve made! I loved Joan, I loved the play, and I loved Shaw’s writing, right from the beginning.

Shaw opened the play from Robert de Baudricourt’s farm, whose hens have been failing to produce any eggs for several days. His men believe that a maid who has been stubbornly stay there was the culprit. The maid is Joan—a peasant girl who asked Baudricourt to equip her with arms and suits, and send her to raise a siege in Orleans during the Hundred Years’ War. How can a seventeen year old girl want to go to a war? Joan isn’t an ordinary girl, for she is chosen by God for the mission. She claims to hear voices of St. Catherine, St. Margaret, and Michael the Archangel, that God has sent her. Something in Joan moves Baudicourt to provide what she wants, and right after that, a miracle happens, the hens laid eggs, and that convinces Baudicourt that Joan is indeed guided by God.

Joan goes to the Dauphin, the young Charles who is waiting to be crowned. Joan wins Charles’ heart; she encourages him to send her to lead his army. He equips and sends her to the battle. In the battle another miracle happens after Joan’s arrival, ensuring Dunois—the chief commander—to let The Maid to lead the army. They win the battle, and Charles is coroneted as King Charles VII. It’s from this battle that Joan is nicknamed The Maid of Orleans. Unfortunately, there are many people who dislike Joan’s conduct. The landlords and the Church authorities have their own reasons to stop Joan’s mission, and so she is captured at last and brought to trial for heresy. As we all know, Joan was then accused of committing heresy, and burnt on the stake as her execution. However, twenty five years later a new trial was being held, which cleared the heresy accusation. Joan then canonized as Saint in 1920.

Retelling a known history might not be an easy job, but Shaw has done it very beautifully. Although we already know the plot, it is very enjoyable to read the play. Joan’s warm, innocent, honest and blunt character is the soul of the play. She made us see what is needed to be God’s servants: humility. Because it is when we are free of personal ego, that God could fill our soul with divine things. The Church authorities in this play are busy with rules, gospels, laws, and doctrines, that they forget what is most important for the Church, that is God’s voices. It is instead in an ordinary peasant girl that He pleased to grant it: Joan.

Although she is only a peasant girl, and never had the opportunity to learn theology or things like that, Joan could match the Chaplain, Bishop and Archbishop’s arguments when debating about God’s voices. For Joan, God’s will is above everything, so no matter how strange His instruction is, she would follow without asking. The intellectual men, on the other hand, are proud with their knowledge and ability, that when they see something they don’t understand, it obviously comes from the devils.

Like I said, this play is very enjoyable. The dialogs are lively and full of emotion; the plot is smooth; and Shaw’s description of the scenes and settings are very clear, as if we are watching the play being performed on stage. Although it is a tragedy, Shaw could be quite funny at times that is enough to make you smile. I like to read Joan’s innocence; her dialogs are sometimes naïve, funny, but also full of virtues. The ending is quite surprising; I won’t even believe that there would be ghosts in a saint story if I haven’t read this play. But I think it just emphasizes the main theme and adds the irony; a perfect way to conclude the whole tragedy. The soldier’s appearance in the ‘ghosts’ conference’ is also quite hilarious! ;)

Five stars for Saint Joan, and it made me want to read Shaw’s other plays. You can also read my deeper analysis of the play here and here.

~~~~~~~~

*I read ebook version from Gutenberg Project*

*This book is counted as:*

12^th book for Let’s Read Plays (September) theme: Freebie

18^th book for What's In a Name Reading Challenge 2013

5^th book for Books on France 2013 Reading Challenge

9^th book for New Authors Reading Challenge 2013

6^th book for Historical Fiction Challenge 2013

53^rd book for The Classics Club Project

The Well-Educated Mind Self Project

Richard III – Final Review

Richard III is the first Shakespeare historical themed play I‘ve ever read, and I can say now that I prefer politics-with-tragedy theme more than any others. After Julius Caesar, I think Richard III has become my new favorite. I enjoyed the clever speeches of Richard and the overall story.

The story begins when England’s two royal Houses of Plantagenet dynasty, Lancaster and York, have just put on a peace treaty after their long time war. It was now Richard’s brother, Edward, who ruled as King of England. Richard seemed to be bored at the idleness of peaceful time, and being encouraged by his high ambition, he invented a bloody strategy to snatch the throne from Edward, and at the same time thwarted the others whom he’s afraid would prevent his plan.

Helped by his friends—Buckingham was his chief supporter—Richard sent murderer to kill a lot of people, including his closest relatives. To highlight his cold heart, even the murderer—who supposed to kill two little innocent princes Prince Edward and Duke of York—felt remorse for a moment, before finally slain them; while Richard took it very lightly. Richard knew that to legitimately take over the throne he must make it desired by the citizens. He worked on it cleverly, and it rewarded him the throne of England.

At this stage he should have been invincible; however as he had reached the throne by deceitful ways, Richard became paranoid of his friends. Small mistakes in replying him could raise Richard’s suspicion; his Kingdom was built on the fragile foundation of fear. Resentful friends betrayed him and supported Earl of Richmond (Henry Tudor) in the Battle of Bosworth, where Richard was finally defeated by Richmond, and England was peaceful once again under King Henry VII (aka Richmond).

Despite of the lack of conscience, Richard’s diplomacy skill deserves two thumbs up. Twice he had had almost-impossible-to-win arguments. First, to propose Lady Anne—whose husband he had just killed—to be his wife. Second is to propose to the Queen (Elizabeth) to marry her daughter; while Richard knows how Elizabeth hates him so much. I know it’s quite absurd how those two ladies could ever agree with him; but nonetheless, Richard’s speeches are very clever and persuasive. And he won both of them! He reminds me a bit of Petruchio in Taming of the Shrew.

Beyond that, it is very hard to sympathize with Richard; he is just a true villain with corrupted soul from the beginning of the play. Nonetheless, Richard is the most interesting character in this play, and learning a bit of his history is quite enjoyable. Here we have battle, murders, a bit of romance, ghost apparition and superstitious, as always with Shakespeare tragedies. I have only one complaint. In the version I read (ebook from feedbooks), the mentioning of the characters are often inconsistent. One example, Lord Stanley is sometimes mentioned too as Derby, which is often confusing.

Four and a half stars for Richard III. You can read my further analysis on this play in my WEM posts.

~~~~~~~

Let’s Read Plays History theme

15^th book for What's In a Name Reading Challenge 2013

4^th book for Historical Fiction Challenge 2013-2015

8^th book for Well-Educated Mind Self Project

47^th book for The Classics Club Project

Si Cantik Dari Notre Dame

Entah mengapa buku ini harus diberi judul Si Cantik dari Notre Dame, bukannya Si Bungkuk dari Notre Dame sesuai judul buku aslinya karangan Victor Hugo: The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Mungkinkah karena alasan komersiil? Karena "cantik" lebih bernilai jual daripada "bungkuk"? Entahlah, tapi nyatanya buku ini adalah versi terjemahan dari kisah legenda yang terkenal tentang sebuah gereja di Paris, Notre Dame.

Di akhir abad ke 15 terdapat 2 golongan yang berseberangan di Paris. Kaum penguasa, gereja dan borjuis di satu sisi, dan golongan masyarakat bawah termasuk gelandangan dan kaum gipsi. Di jaman itulah Claude Frollo yang pandai, suka belajar, dan ambisius hidup sebagai yatim piatu sambil membesarkan adik yang sangat dikasihinya, Jehan Frollo. Suatu hari ia melewati seorang bocah yang diletakkan di depan gereja untuk dipungut siapapun yang berminat. Sayangnya penampilan anak itu sangat mengerikan. Wajahnya seperti monster yang sangat buruk dan tubuhnya berbonggol-bonggol dengan tulang punggung bengkok. Semua orang ngeri dan menganggap bocah itu jelmaan setan. Semua, kecuali Claude Frollo. Tanpa pikir panjang, dipungutnya bocah itu lalu dipelihara dan dididik.

Tak ada orang yang tahan memandang Quasimodo, begitulah si monster dinamai sesuai dengan hari saat ia dipungut, apalagi bergaul dengannya. Semua orang bahkan membencinya. Hanya Claude Frollo yang menganggapnya manusia. Tak heran, ia begitu mengasihi, memuja ayah angkatnya itu begitu intens. Saat Claude Frollo menjadi wakil uskup, Quasimodo menjadi pemukul lonceng di gereja Notre Dame serta tinggal di gereja itu bersama ayah angkatnya. Gereja itu menjadi surganya, dan lonceng-lonceng gereja menjadi pusat hidup dan kebahagiaannya. Meskipun belakangan, justru lonceng-lonceng itu pula yang merenggut hal yang sangat berharga baginya, yakni pendengarannya. Ya, ia menjadi tuli karena terlalu sering mendengar dentangan lonceng yang sangat keras...

Sedangkan di luar dinding-dinding gereja yang tinggi itu, hiduplah seorang gadis gipsi yang sangat cantik, pandai menyanyi dan menari dengan rebananya, serta berpembawaan riang. Dialah La Esmeralda yang selalu didampingi kambing cerdik bernama Djali. Kecantikannya yang segar dan alami membuat kaum pria dari berbagai golongan terpesona padanya. Ada Gringoire sang filsuf dan penyair yang ditolong Esmeralda dari tiang gantungan dengan menjadikannya suami platonis. Ada juga seorang perwira kerajaan yang tampan dan playboy, yang seharusnya sudah bertunangan namun masih saja melirik gadis lain, bernama Phoebus. Bahkan Quasimodo si buruk rupa nan tuli itu juga terpesona pada kesegaran Esmeralda. Namun yang paling mengherankan justru pengagumnya yang datang dari dalam gereja! Sang wakil uskup, yang seharusnya hidup selibat, malah memiliki hasrat yang besar terhadap Esmeralda....

Bagaimana dengan Esmeralda sendiri? Seperti layaknya kisah-kisah romantis lainnya, ia justru jatuh cinta pada pria yang tak sungguh-sungguh mencintainya, Phoebus. Betapa ironisnya cinta itu ya? Cerita lalu berpusar-pusar pada tokoh Esmeralda ini. Esmeralda yang selalu membawa kantung kecil bermanik di sekeliling lehernya, Esmeralda yang selalu menjaga kesuciannya karena bila ia ternoda, ia diramal takkan bisa bertemu dengan ibunya yang tak pernah ia temui. Esmeralda yang rela menikahi Gringoire karena iba, meski harus memaksa Gringoire berjanji untuk tak menyentuhnya. Esmeralda yang ditangkap dan akan dihukum gantung. Esmeralda yang diselamatkan. Esmeralda yang dituduh melakukan pembunuhan, dan seterusnya. Bahkan Esmeralda juga membuat kaum gipsi dan gelandangan menyerbu gereja di tengah malam buta. (mungkin saja pemilihan judul versi terjemahan ini justru lebih tepat ya, karena jelas pusat kisah ini adalah si cantik Esmeralda).

Lewat kisah ini, Victor Hugo mengajak kita untuk memahami berbagai makna cinta. Cinta platonis milik Gringoire, yang puas hanya dengan memandang keceriaan istrinya (dan malah lebih cinta pada kambingnya, Djali...). Cinta palsu milik Phoebus yang hanya terpikat pada kecantikan lahiriah semata, dan secepat cinta itu datang, secepat itu pula ia tergantikan. Cinta penuh napsu dan obsesif milik Claude Frollo sehingga ia rela melakukan apa saja yang berpotensi mencoreng namanya dan gereja, demi menghalangi pria manapun menyentuh Esmeralda-nya. Atau cinta murni milik seorang Quasimodo. Cinta yang tak ingin memiliki, hanya ingin melindungi. Cinta yang membuatnya cukup hanya memandang dari jauh, dan tak pernah menuntut balasan apapun.

Victor Hugo juga membukakan mata kita terhadap cinta terhadap sesama manusia. Betapa mudahnya orang mengkotak-kotakkan manusia lain hanya karena derajat. Bagaimana orang gipsi dianggap jahat dan mistis, bagaimana orang yang penampilannya berbeda dengan kebanyakan yang lain dianggap bukan manusia, jelmaan setan, jahat, kejam seperti binatang. Betapa mengerikan akibat yang ditimbulkan manusia kala ia tak mau melihat ke kedalaman hati, melainkan hanya pada penampilan luar. Kisah di buku ini membuktikannya.

Akhirnya, aku juga sadar bahwa jatuh ke dalam dosa itu begitu gampangnya. Bahkan Claude Frollo yang pemikir dan logis, yang sejak kecil religius, yang dulu mengasihi adiknya dan memungut Quasimodo karena kasih, mampu menjadi pribadi yang berbeda saat ia membiarkan hasrat menguasai dirinya. Maka dosa itu bukan soal 'siapa', namun lebih pada 'bagaimana'. Bagaimana kita menyikapi suatu keadaan. Bagaimana kita menentukan pilihan. Bagaimanapun, hidup ini selalu mengenai pilihan kan? Sama seperti anda yang bebas memilih, cukup puas dengan membaca resensiku, atau mau membaca buku yang indah ini sendiri....

NB:

1. Kalau anda memilih yang terakhir, Vixxio bisa membantu anda mendapatkan buku ini dengan diskon 20% di: Si Cantik Dari Notre Dame.

2. Kalau anda merasa bosan dan bingung di bab-bab awal, jangan menyerah! Karena makin ke belakang, anda akan menemukan keindahan yang sesungguhnya kisah ini. Aku hampir saja melewatkannya, jangan sampai anda juga!

3. Salut pada penerbit Serambi yang mampu menyajikan terjemahan apik pada karya sastra seindah milik Victor Hugo. Namun sayang, ada beberapa halaman yang tak tertata dengan baik. Ada paragraf yang terulang, ada halaman yang tak menyambung (meloncat) dengan halaman berikutnya, dan ini lumayan mengganggu keasyikan membaca. Semoga itu hanya terjadi di eksemplar yang aku beli saja ya...