Someone has
mentioned to me that The Turn of the
Screw is 'interesting'. Normally a gothic-horror-ghost story is labeled as
scary or dark, rarely interesting. But after finishing the book for R.I.P XIII challenge, I agree that this book is, indeed, interesting!
The Turn of the Screw is a novella
(my copy contains 96 pages—excluding introduction and preface). And if you are
familiar with Henry James' flowery writing style, believe me, other writers
would have written it much shorter! However, the discussion that might follow
the reading would be very long...
In short, the story is narrated by a man who was telling a story to his friends
'round the fire' on a Christmas Eve. It was a queer story he got from his
friend, a young woman who was hired by a gentleman to be a governess. The
gentleman is a bachelor who had been left guardian for his orphan niece and
nephew in a country home called Bly in Essex. He specifically instructed the
governess to never bother him for any trouble whatsoever. Arriving at Bly, our
governess found a nice housekeeper, a sweet little girl called Flora, and a
letter from the boy's school, announcing that Miles (the boy) was expelled from
school; although Mrs. Grose the housekeeper said he is a sweet child who won't
trouble anyone. Then series of queer things unrolled one after another that
distressed the governess: supernatural apparitions of a man (not a gentleman)
and a woman, who Mrs. Grose pointed as the late servant (Peter Quint) and governess
(Miss Jessel). Then there were also the two sweet children, whom the governess
knew have seen and communicated with the ghosts, but never told her anything.
Things got complicated when Mrs. Grose revealed that Peter Quint and Miss
Jessel have made a scandalous love affair. Our heroine also realised that Mrs.
Grose could not see the apparitions! The sweet children then started to behave
cunningly, and our heroine suspected that it was the dead lovers who brought
evil influence to them when they made contact with the poor children. Bad
things turned to worse, and the story ended abruptly by a sudden death of
someone in the house.
Many believe that the ghosts only existed in the governess' mind (because Mrs.
Grose never saw it), and that the whole story was only the product of her
hallucination. Is it so? Mrs. Grose did not see the apparition, and has never
confirmed the governess' suspicion. One tangible proof is the letter from
school. It could have proven that Miles had turned evil and done wicked things
to his friends. However, Mrs. Grose could not read, so she could not confirm
either.
The only
subject she positively agreed with the governess is the bad character of Peter
Quint and Miss Jessel. But what would it prove? So, all in all, I think James purposely
created an intricate condition, of which we could not find single evidence that:
a) there were ghosts, and b) the children turned evil from the ghosts’ evil
influences. James just wanted this story to be ambiguous, and to make the
readers debating forever, perhaps? He succeeded if that’s what he wanted.
Anyway, it
is a nice gothic ghost story, and certainly very interesting. However, James'
writing style sometimes washed away the spookiness of the story, and left only
the interesting bit.
3,5 / 5
I almost picked this up to read last week. Instead I started James’s Portrait of a Lady. This world have been more seasonal. It also sounds so very good. I hope to get to it soon.
ReplyDeleteActually I liked Portrait of a Lady better than this one. But James' works and readers are always a love-hate relationship, so I am really curious how you would take Portrait... :)
DeleteI went back and reread my posts on this novella after reading your review. James is not for me, and I think he actually botched the story somewhat, but I loved the premise and the ambiguity of the story.
ReplyDelete>James' writing style sometimes washed away the spookiness of the story
I totally agree with your assessment on this.
Agree, Jane! The story and ambiguity would have made a perfect ghost story; but for the writing style... I had to read the looong sentences twice to get his meaning (and usually while constructing the shorter and simpler way to say it!) -_-
DeleteHey, if it's not too spooky, I might read it this month! Thanks for the review. :)
ReplyDeleteIt's like when someone tries too hard to explain something to you with double sentences, that made you only puzzled in the end... :P
DeleteI say listen to it! Emma Thompson narrates the story and it was that much better.
ReplyDeleteGood idea! Thanks, Heather... I might try someday.
DeleteSeeing this title always brings me back to college. I have vivid memories of reading it and discussing it in one of my first college lit classes. Seems a lot of folks say that the whole thing is basically about sex. I'm gathering you do not prescribe to that school of interpretive thought on this one. I am going to ahve to dig up the paper I wrote about it back then and see what the hell we were on about.
ReplyDeleteHappy reading!
Hi Nikki, yes, I did not get chance to discussing classic books back in school. I'm curious about that sex interpretation you were talking about, because I didn't see the conenction. I have, actually, thought that the children could have been Peter Quint's & Miss Jessel's. But as the ending is hanging like that, I was not so sure. Is that what you mean?
DeleteI just read a book with Henry James as one of the characters. In this novel by Dan Simmons, the author describes James as trying to make the reader increasingly nervous about whether the governess was unstable and corrupting the children's minds or there was actually a presence. I must have been too young when I read it, but I always assumed there were actual ghosts - the ambiguity was sort of lost on me!
ReplyDeleteI, too, have not thought there's any ambiguity. I thought the story was reasonable enough. But then I read some online articles, and only then that I realised, that if I viewed the ghost from the housekeeper's view, there was gap enough.
DeleteI think I might be interested in that novel by Dan Simmons you mentioned. Never heard of him before, but will take a look soon. Thanks, Priya..