🐷 I have read almost all –
if not all - Agatha Christie's crime novels, yet, still could never accurately
predict the murderer before the d
énouement. Oh, I guessed them quite
often, I did. Yet, I have never been completely sure. You know how it is, if not a
couple of red-herrings that make you doubt yourself, then the idea is too
absurd - like in
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, for instance. When I got
to several last chapters of
Five Little Pigs, I saw a loophole, and knew
instantly the murderer. It was a 'eureka' moment for me. I got to the d
énouement
excitingly; have I predicted the whodunnit correctly this time? Alas, no!
Agatha Christie did it again.
🐷 A young girl called
Clara Lemarchant hired Poirot to investigate a murder of her father, sixteen
years ago. Her mother, Caroline Crale, was found guilty of poisoning him. Carla
never doubts that her mother was innocent, but now that she's engaged to be
married, Carla and her fiancé needs to know the truth.
🐷 Investigating a murder
that happened in the past has its difficulty - the detective can't see the
crime scene, or looking for clues. But these things never hamper Hercule Poirot
- his investigation method is more on the psychological side, besides on the
facts. For this case, he interviews people who was involved in the case: the
police, the solicitor, the doctor. But most importantly, he visits five people
who were present at the crime scene: Philip Blake (close friend of the victim -
a painter called Amyas Crale), Meredith Blake (amateur chemist, Philip's
brother, in love with Caroline Crale), Elsa Greer (young girl, Amyas's model,
wanting to marry him), Angela Warren (Caroline's half-sister), and Cecilia
Williams (Angela's governess). These five are Poirot's suspects, whom he dubs
as 'five little pigs', following a nursery rhyme.
🐷 These interviews and,
later on, five written "views" from each suspect's perspective on the
event, help Poirot to see the truth, which had eluded the police sixteen years
ago. His success was due to his ability to analyze psychological condition of
all the suspects, but particularly of Caroline.
🐷 At first, it seemed
like a simple case. Amyas must have angered someone, and the person saw an
opportunity, and put something into his drink. But Poirot shows us that it
wasn't that simple. The solution was smart, and Christie had actually put a
hint in the previous chapter, if only I've read more thoroughly. Just one word
that I have thought incorrect before, proved to be the key. I would have to be
careful to mince every word and sentence on my next Christie read – she’s such
a skillful words-weaver!
🐷 This mystery isn't like
any regular Golden Age detective stories, which depend on clues and alibis.
It's all about psychology. Another masterpiece from Christie, and I don't
understand why it wasn't as famous as, say...
Murder on the Orient Express,
which I found 'meh'. I have completed this book by listening to the audiobook
version, narrated, as with most of Christie’s audiobooks, by Hugh Fraser.
Rating: 5 / 5
For Bingo Card: Death by Poison
For Monthly Theme: Books by Agatha Christie