Reading your
favorite book for the second time can sometimes be quite risky. You can end up
either liking it the more, or disliking it. Because on second reading, you
would be reading more thoroughly; examining the characters more closely,
analyzing and calculating every cause and effect. Maybe you would still love it
because the author wrote it beautifully, but most probably you would see the
characters differently. Then you only focused on their fates, but now you might
also see their flaws. It happened to me when giving Wharton’s The House of Mirth a second reading.
I still love
it, yes, and perhaps even love it more now, as this time no curiosity on the
plot obstructed me from savoring Wharton’s beautiful prose. But, as I delved
more deeply, I began to question my (blind) judgment on a character I used to
praise then. I’m talking about Lawrence Selden. Until last month he seemed
almost perfect to me, now I began to see his flaw; that is his lack of trust in
Lily when he saw her fled from Trenor’s house that night. But that didn’t make
me dislike him; on the contrary, it made Selden more humane. Though I kept
thinking how everything might have been different if Selden kept his plan.
On my first
reading, my focus was on Lily Bart, whom I analyzed for WEM project.
Now I had the leisure to take on Selden. I begin to feel that Selden is the
motor of the whole story. It all begins and ends with him. Maybe Selden is
Wharton’s own view of the society at that time. I haven’t had close study on
her, but from wiki I learned that though growing up in upper class society,
Wharton was one of its hardest critics. Selden, too, enjoys the privilege of
being with the upper class, but he also ‘disgusted’ with them.
One of the
most interesting things about Selden, is his theory of “the republic of the spirit”—the
freedom of having choices to make; not being helplessly dictated by society.
Wharton also rejected the standards of
fashion and etiquette that were expected of young girls at the time, intended
to enable women to marry well and to be displayed at balls and parties. She
thought these requirements were superficial and oppressive [Wikipedia]. Instead, she was eager to have higher education.
I think this is what Selden’s idea with his republic
of the spirit—something that Lily Bart envied him for.
Another
interesting point is, throughout the novel, there is a sense of ambiguity in Lily’s
character. Lily Bart is introduced as an intelligent woman, who is able to skillfully
read human characters to use it as a weapon for her advantage. She has maneuvered
geniusly to attract Percy Gryce—though she failed in finishing it. Yet, she
failed to predict her aunt’s reaction to her (rumored) scandal. I agree with Carry
Fisher, that the cause of Lily’s fall is laziness and her longing of freedom
and happiness (thanks partly to Selden’s influence!). In the Percy Gryce
failure, it makes sense, but how can she be lazy when her whole life was
depended on her aunt’s legacy? I just don’t get it.
All in all,
I am grateful I have given The House of Mirth a second reading; I love it more
now, and would one day revisit it again. Thanks to Adam for hosting the
#CBAM2017, and to you all who have been reading this treasure with me.
For more
about this book, you can browse my analysis and review on my first reading.
Wonderful review. Makes me want to hurry up and get back into reading the novels from WEM all over again. l plan to, God willing, but I am so anxious to start soon.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, my memory of House of Mirth is shady, though it would help me to read my review again. I Remember Lily and Seldon and the frustration involved in their friendship. But all the little details are gone from my memory.
Thanks Ruth. I thought I have analyzed everything of this book for WEM. Yet, I found many new things I just realized only from second reading. Hopefully you can get to it again soon, with or without WEM.
DeleteI read The House of Mirth the summer after I graduated from college. I loved it. I need to go back and re-read. Your re-reading experience reminds me of how I read Mr. Rochester different. There is 16 year old me who thought he was dashing and then current me who thinks he is a privileged man who takes advantage of Jane.
ReplyDeleteHaha... then I need to go back to all the classics I have tackled very earlier..
DeleteBut I agree, what make a book a classic is that you can read the same book in different way at different age. I bet you will find more in House of Mirth on second reading.