Thursday, August 16, 2012

Algernon Moncrieff on The Importance of Being Earnest


Digital Art / Drawings / Illustrations / 
Conceptual ©2012 ~mbeau.com
Algernon is the most complex character in this play. In a way he shared a similarity to his friend Jack Worthing (in creating an imaginary character to hide himself in), however for the rest, he was completely different to Jack. Algernon was a dandy young man—who I think was similar to Oscar Wilde himself (and I can’t think but to see Wilde’s presence in Algy!). Jack described him as ‘over-dressed’ and ‘always feels hungry’. Algernon’s passion in food was ridiculous in this play, that he could eat all cucumber sandwiches that were supposed to be served for his aunt, and had to tell lie to his aunt that there have been no cucumbers available in the market! And the scene of him had a fight for muffins with Jack…oh..that was so….funny!!

Algernon was a selfish, indifferent, immoral and cynical man. Like Jack, he too had an imaginary character called Bunbury, which he used every time he needed to avoid some events he disliked. However, unlike Jack, Algernon was so irresponsible and indifferent, that he stole Ernest’s (second identity of Jack) identity for his own interest, without slightest care to what that would have affected Jack. Algernon was also snob, his vanity of fashion and education was perhaps the perfect picture of Victorian society at that time (Wilde’s critics?).

What made him more similar to Wilde (which I also found in The Picture of Dorian Gray’s Lord Henry) was the nonsense and paradoxes he often said along the play.

“You never talk anything but nonsense.” ~Jack.



Other similarity with Wilde’s other work, Algernon was immoral and has unromantic and cynical (sometimes rather absurd) idea about love, relationship and (especially) marriage.

“Algy, you always adopt a strictly immoral attitude towards life.” ~Gwendolen.

“It is very romantic to be in love, but there is nothing romantic about a definite proposal. The very essence of romance is uncertainty” ~Algernon

In short, Algernon was a man who was never serious, funny yes, but irresponsible and very selfish. Algernon lived for the pleasures, not for life itself; a kind of character I hate the most!


Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Mahabharata (1): an Indian Epic-Mythology


If you are familiar with Greek mythology, Iliad and Odyssey from Homer, Mahabharata is an Indian mythology which is ten times longer than the Iliad and Odyssey combined into one book. This ancient epic tales was predicted to be written around the year of 500 BC by a monk called Vyasa. It’s a kind of family saga, the Pandavas and Kauravas. I read the graphic novel version, re-told by one of the greatest illustrator in Indonesia: R.A. Kosasih (recently passed away). The most interesting thing of this graphic novel is that Kosasih put the Indian mythology into Indonesian folklore nuances, from the clothes and the names they called each other, that when I first read it as a child, I have always thought that Mahabharata was an Indonesian tale! Apart from the cultural aspects, Mahabharata was a beautiful epic about love, brotherhood, sacrifice, greediness and revenge.

Like Greek mythology, there were alliances between gods and human. The gods always monitor and control every thing happened on earth from their place “up there”. When men were in danger or sorrow, they could meditate and called the gods to help them with their maneuver. When men hated each other, they could spell a curse towards another, and when the gods approved, the curse would be affected right at that moment.

This graphic novel were divided into two volumes, the first one depicted the ancestors of Pandavas and Kauravas. Mahabharata was the early setting of one of the greatest wars in epics between the two families: Pandava and Kaurava; here we learned about their ancestors and the seeds of hatred that would turn into war. The war itself was told in Bharatayudha. 

It all began with a kingdom named Hastinapura, which was ruled by King Shantanu. One day, the lonely king went hunting in a forest and met a very beautiful girl whom he fell in love with. The girl was actually the Ganga goddess. They were married and had a son named Devavrata before the Ganga goddess finally returned to heaven. Devavrata grown up as a courageous, wise, strong, handsome, and smart young man (he was half god and half man anyway). He loved his father very much, but noticed that his father was not happy recently and finally got very ill. He asked him why, and King Shantanu told his son that one day he had met a beautiful girl named Satyavati—a daughter of a fisherman—whom he has fallen in love with. He could not marry her because Satyavati had had an oath that she would only marry a King, and that their son must heir the throne and become the future king. As Shantanu has made Devavrata his successor, he knew he could never marry the woman he loved.

Satyavaty was actually a princess from a kingdom, but has been put into an exile because of a strange and humiliating illness. She married a monk and had a son who was called Vyasa. That was how she had that oath. Devavrata, being a devoted son, promised that he would release his right of the throne so that his father could marry the woman he loved. But what about his future children, what if they demand their rights?, asked the dying father. And then Devavrata made an oath that he would take a lifelong celibacy so that the throne would always be safe. The gods heard and admired the great sacrifice Devavrata has made for his father’s sake, and gave him a new name: Bhishma. King Shantanu then married Satyavati and had two sons: Chitrangada and Vichitravirya.

Chitrangada—the future king—died suddenly in a very young age, left Vicitravirya who was not as good as his died brother in swordsmanship. At that time there was a competition held by a King to find a husband for his three princesses. Satyavati wanted a wife for King Vicitravirya, but knowing that he was not a good swordsman, Bhishma volunteered to fight in the name of the King. Shortly, Bhishma won the three princesses: Amba (the eldest), Ambika and Ambalika. Amba felt she was too old for Hastinapura’s King, and has fallen in love with Bhishma instead. She asked Bhishma to marry her, but Bhishma—who has sworn not to marry—refused her. Amba kept approaching Bhishma, and the later, in order perhaps to fight his own passion accidentally shot Amba with his arrow. In her last breath, Amba begged the gods that her soul would transformed in the body of a woman who would take Bhishma’s life in the future. And the gods approved it.

A sudden death came to King Vicitravirya, leaving the throne of Hastinapura without a successor. In desperation, Satyavati called for his son, Vyasa who agreed “to father children” with Ambika and Ambalika (this was a common practice in India when a man cannot have child). Vyasa was pictured as a man with terrifying looks, so when he came to Ambika, the girl kept shutting her eyes. Later on she gave birth to a blind child (because she kept shutting her eyes during the process). Ambalika has been warned by Vyasa not to shut her eyes like Ambika, however the disgust made her face grew pale during the process, and her child born with pale skin. Unsatisfied with the result, Satyavati asked his son to father one more child with one of the princesses. However, both Ambika and Ambalika did not want to have another session with Vyasa, so they arranged a maid to replace them. From her, born the third child. They were named: Dhritarashtra (the blind), Pandu (the pale skin), and Vidura.

Pandu—despite the fact that he was a second son—was made King because a blind man cannot rule a Kingdom. When they were grown up, Pandu went to a competition to get a wife, Dhritarashtra and Vidura came with him. Pandu, helped by Dhritarashtra, won the competition and brought home Princess Kunti. However there are two other contestants who were not satisfied with the result; they challenged Pandu to do another fights, and if they were lost, they would give their sisters to Pandu. In short, instead of one wife, Pandu brought home three princesses: Kunti, Madri and Gandhari. Satyavati instructed Pandu to share one of them with Dhritarashtra while Vidura refused to have a wife. Then came the selection day, and of course the three princesses were terrified they would be chosen by the blind young man instead of the handsome Pandu. The three secretly prayed to their gods to help them, however in a strange coincidence, Gandhari was chosen by Dhritarashtra.

One day Pandu went hunting to the forest and shot a pair of deer who were making love. The deer turned out to be a monk who transformed himself and his wife to a pair of deer to have privacy when they made love. The monk then cursed Pandu that he won’t be able to have sex for the rest of his life, for whenever he had passion to his wives, he would soon die. Pandu retired to be a monk together with his wives, and left the throne to Dhritarashtra while he was away. Now being a queen, Gandhari was never satisfied because she knew when Pandu returned, she won’t be queen anymore. She prayed to gods to give her a lot of children to protect the throne. The gods answered her prayers, Gandhari was soon pregnant.

However, instead of a baby, Gandhari gave birth to a piece of flesh when she was walking at the garden one night. She kicked the flesh in disgust, and the flesh divided itself to many pieces. The god instructed Gandhari to cover the fleshes with leaves, and went to sleep. In the morning, the fleshes had turned into babies, one hundred babies! Now Gandhari has her protector for Hastinapura throne, and the one hundred children were called the Kaurava. The news came to Kunti and Madri, they too wanted to have their own children, however as Pandu was unable to give them child, they prayed to their gods. The gods fulfilled their wishes, Kunti was given three sons, one from Dharma (the god of justice) and born Yudhisthira, one from Vayu (the god of the wind) and born Bhima, and one from Indra (the lord of the heaves for sons) and got Arjuna. Madri gave birth to twins: Nakula and Sahadeva from Ashwini (the twin gods). Te fifth of them were called the Pandava. However, Pandu could not keep his passion towards Madri, and when they made love, Pandu died.

Lived in the same palace, Pandavas and Kauravas grew up as different characters. While Pandavas became good and polite young men, Kauravas who were being spoiled by their mother has become villain and greedy. Dhritarashtra made Yudhisthira a crown prince, but he kept the ambition to made his own son Duryodana (the eldest of Kauravas) to be the king of Hastinapura (he might have been persuaded by the greedy Gandhari). Kauravas, helped by their evil uncle Shakuni (brother of Gandhari) made a plan to get rid of Pandavas in a fire accident. Luckily for Pandavas and their mother Kunthi, their wise uncle Vidura has made protection for them by instructing his men to dig a tunnel beneath their palace. Saved from the fire accident, the Pandavas returned to Hastinapura only to find that Duryodana has been made King. The elders had a meeting, and decided that the Pandavas should build their own kingdom which was called Indraprashta. When they were on pilgrimage to return from fire accident, Arjuna has won Draupadi as a wife. Here there are ambiguities, in the version I read, Arjuna refused to marry Draupadi and gave Draupadi for his brother Yudhisthira, who finally agreed to marry her. However, in the original version, Kunthi asked Arjuna to share Draupadi with all his brothers. Draupadi finally married all five of Pandavas (this too, a common practice in India, a woman can have more than one husband).

Draupadi & her five husbands-the Pandavas


One day when Indraprashta has become a big kingdom, they invited the Kauravas to the palace. There Duryodana grew envious of the elegant palace of Pandavas. It was added with a humiliating accident where Duryodana splashed in the water when he thought it was glossy floor. The Kauravas came home with revenge in their head, and since then they could not think other than a perfect plot to humiliate the Pandavas.

It was long, I know! :) And this is just PART ONE of Mahabharata, there will be part two! I write the entire plot here to memorize them myself. From the story, I just realized that the four elements of life: love, hatred, greediness and revenge are always the plot of most stories of human lives. And those were also the most causes of wars. I read Mahabharata as I was a child, and I re-read it many times after that. One thing I just realized as adult reader (and after I can browse the internet) that Vyasa is believed to be the same person as Krishna Dvaipayana. It was not mentioned here in the graphic novel I read; Krishna here was the King of Dwaraka, an advisor to Pandavas, whose main concern was to keep the whole kingdom in peace. He was invincible in fighting, because he was the incarnation of Vishnu god. To imagine that Krishna and Vyasa was the same person would be interesting. I think I should keep reading the Part two (and perhaps continue on to Bharatayudha) to learn more about this.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Literary Classics Challenge - Friday Progress (7)

Woman Reading - anythinggauche.com

After two months of Victorian reading (June & July) I felt quite exhausted; so for August I have picked books that I really want to read, and most of them are not classics. However I still put two classics in my schedule. One of them is from Albanian’s author: Ismail Kadare. I haven’t read his works before, and this time I read the translated version (Bahasa Indonesia) of The Palace of Dreams. It’s a bit magical realism, and the main theme is the dictatorship of Ottoman Empire in 19th century who controlled the dreams of its people. Although the theme is quite interesting, I did not find it very entertaining. Here’s my review.

Yesterday I started Germinal by Emile Zola. Zola is one of my favorite authors, and I found the first few pages were beautifully written, that I have a feeling I’ll enjoy this book. Next week will be a long holiday here in Indonesia (the moslem will celebrate Idul Fitri), so from 17th to 22nd I will stay at home, and hopefully I can read as much as I want to. Along with Germinal, I have planned to re-read ancient Indian epic: Mahabharata. I have the re-told version in graphic novels in my collection (two hardcover books), it’s in Bahasa Indonesia and illustrated in Indonesian folklore by a famous Indonesian comics illustrator. I have read this several times when I was a kid, and it will be nice to re-read it as an adult reader. I still remember that there are many good moral value in it, which I think worth to read for many times.

So…how about you? How is your classics reading for this week? And what is your plan for next week?

The Palace of Dreams (Istana Mimpi)


[conclusion is at the bottom of this post]

Setiap orang yang menguasai daerah kegelapan dalam diri manusia akan memiliki kekuatan yang luar biasa.”

‘Daerah kegelapan’ di quote tersebut dapat kita asumsikan sebagai mimpi. Maka setiap orang (atau institusi) yang menguasai mimpi manusia, akan memiliki kekuatan luar biasa. Dalam kisah realism-magis karya Ismail Kadare ini, kekaisaran Ottoman yang meraja di abad 19 memiliki institusi yang disebut Istana Mimpi atau Tabir Sarrail. Di Tabir Sarrail, mimpi dari seluruh masyarakat se-kekhalifahan dikumpulkan, disalin, dipilah-pilah, kemudian ditafsirkan. Dari mimpi-mimpi itulah Sultan atau pemimpin kekhalifahan mengetahui kondisi kekhalifahan yang dipimpinnya; mirip dengan dinas inteligen dalam suatu negara.

Mark-Alem adalah seorang pemuda pemalu dan penggugup yang kebetulan merupakan anggota keluarga Quprili—keluarga paling berpengaruh yang banyak menempatkan anggotanya dalam jabatan-jabatan tinggi di kekhalifahan. Antara Sultan dan keluarga Quprili selalu ada permusuhan, gara-gara kecemburuan Sultan terhadap keluarga Quprili yang kisahnya sering disebut-sebut dalam epik di Albania maupun Serbia, sementara tak pernah ada orang menciptakan epik tentang sang Sultan sendiri. Dalam kondisi ini, Mark-Alem tiba-tiba mendapati dirinya diterima bekerja di Tabir Sarrail sebagai staf bagian Penyortiran. Mark yang tak tahu apa-apa, selalu kebingungan dari awal bekerja, tak tahu apa yang harus dikerjakannya, tiba-tiba saja karirnya melesat dengan cepatnya. Meski ia perlahan-lahan menyadari bahwa keberadaannya di Tabir Sarrail adalah karena kepentingan politik keluarganya, ia tak tahu apa yang mereka harapkan darinya. Hingga terjadilah sebuah malapetaka bagi keluarga Quprili, dan saat itulah Mark menyadari betapa besar kekuasaan sebuah mimpi terhadap jatuh bangunnya sebuah kekuasaan!

Buku ini berkisah tentang kediktatoran, di mana sebuah institusi dapat mengontrol bukan hanya kehidupan rakyatnya, namun hingga hal pribadi seperti mimpi. Aku masih saja bertanya-tanya, bagaimana kekhalifahan dapat ‘memperdaya’ rakyatnya untuk mengirimkan mimpi-mimpi mereka? Tak sadarkah mereka bahwa itu melanggar hak asasi mereka? Apalagi pasti sudah banyak kasus para pemimpi yang mimpinya bersifat ‘berbahaya’ hilang lenyap tanpa pernah kembali ke rumahnya setelah diinterogasi di Tabir Sarrail. Pertanyaan kedua, bagaimana penguasa dapat memastikan bahwa mimpi yang dikisahkan itu adalah mimpi sebenarnya yang dialami pemimpi? Atau justru, bagaimana mereka dapat memastikan bahwa mimpi itu bukan rekayasa salah satu pihak untuk menjatuhkan mereka?

Kalau demikian halnya, pertanyaan terbesarnya: Sebenarnya siapa yang menguasai siapa? Kekhalifahan menguasai rakyat karena mengontrol mimpi mereka? Ataukah mimpi-mimpi milik rakyat itu yang justru menguasai kekhalifahan, karena Sultan begitu percaya (dan takut)nya pada mimpi-mimpi itu? Ironisnya, lewat Istana Mimpi Sultan berhasil menyerang keluarga Quprili, namun justru lewat Istana Mimpi pula kurasa keluarga ini—lewat Mark-Alem yang akhirnya menjadi Kepala Istana Mimpi—akan berbalik mengalahkan sang Sultan. Sang Sultan boleh saja tetap penguasa kekhalifahan, namun bukankah siapa yang menguasai mimpi berarti memiliki kekuatan luar biasa?

Sebuah penggambaran metafora yang indah dari Ismail Kadare tentang kediktatoran yang menguasai pikiran, namun aku merasa kisah ini lemah sebagai fiksi karena ceritanya melompat begitu cepat, tanpa keterangan apakah dari scene sebelumnya ke scene berikut berjarak hari, bulan atau tahun. Mark-Alem mulai bekerja setelah lulus kuliah, namun di akhir kisah ia tiba-tiba berusia 28 tahun, jadi apakah rentang waktu antara ia mulai masuk Tabir Sarrail hingga menduduki posisi puncak memakan waktu bertahun-tahun? Di sini Ismail Kadare kurang teliti dalam merakit cerita, mungkin justru dengan sedikit melebarkan plot, beliau akan menghasilkan cerita yang lebih berkesan.

Tiga mimpi untuk Istana Mimpi!

Judul: Istana Mimpi (judul asli: The Palace of Dreams)
Penulis: Ismail Kadare
Penerjemah: Fahmy Yamani
Editor: Adi Toha
Penerbit: Serambi Cerita Utama
Terbit: Juni 2012
Tebal: 274 hlm

Conclusion:

The Palace of Dreams is a magic-realism story by Ismail Kadare about how the dictatorship of Ottoman Kingdom in 19th century oppressed its people by controlling their dreams. Everyone must send details of their dreams to be noted, sorted and interpreted by an institution called The Palace of Dreams or Tabir Sarrail, which was run by the Sovereign. These dreams are powerful tools for the Sovereign to keep updated about every movement among the Kingdom; some kind of intelligence agencies.

The protagonist is Mark-Alem, a young man who was just graduated and found a job inside the Palace of Dreams; this story was told from his point of view. Later on he realized that he was placed there by his powerful family—the Quprili—who had the biggest influence in the whole Kingdom, that even the Sovereign was terrified of them. Mark worked at the Selection department, and one day he found a specific dream. He did not know what to do with it or how to interpret it. Little did he know that that particular dream would cause a huge blow for someone he loved; if only he had known what that dream was about when he was in charge of it! What had happened to the Quprilis only confirmed that who holds people’s dream, has the biggest power on his hands. And poor Mark-Alem, despite of his career leap from the Selection department to the highest level in Tabir Sarrail, was only a helpless pawn in a power war between Quprili family and the Sovereign.

This is quite an interesting story but there are few things that I did not really get it. Firstly, how the Kingdom forced people to voluntarily send every personal dream they had? Didn’t it occur to the people that that practice was against their human rights? They could have lied that they rarely had a dream; who could proof it? Secondly, how did the Sovereign make sure that the dreams received by Tabir Sarrail were not fake dreams written by whomever against them? If they were so affected by the dreams, that the Sovereign used them to make his decisions, how absurd it was! Didn’t it mean that the dreams have controlled the Sovereign rather than the other way?

The story’s idea is OK, but I think Kadare should have widened the plot to make it flow more naturally. There are no signs of time setting in this book, I did not know whether Mark-Alem has been working for weeks or month or years before he was promoted to a higher level. He started his career straight after his graduation, however he was already twenty eight when the story ended. Did it mean all of these had happened for years? I don’t know…

Three stars for The Palace of Dream, the first Albanian literature I have ever read! [I read the Indonesian translation edition]

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Jack Worthing on The Importance of Being Earnest

The main protagonist in this Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest is Jack Worthing. I see Jack as a respectable young man with a polite manner. Although he was only found and adopted by a rich Mr. Cardew, he had grown up in an honorable family. Of course, Jack also adhered to Victorian values at that time, which were respectable and responsible. Jack has become a guardian to Mr. Cardew’s granddaughter, and I think, has been an honorable example for his community. These are others thought about Jack:

“Dear Uncle Jack is so very serious! Sometimes he is so serious that I think he cannot be quite well.” ~Cecily.

“I know no one who has a higher sense of duty and responsibility.” ~Miss Prism.

 Although he has tried to fulfill the Victorian society expectations (about honor and respectability), Jack felt the responsible is unbearable that he needed something to balance his life. He hid himself in his fictional young brother Ernest Worthing’s role every time he needs to run away. On the contrary to his own qualities, Jack invented an irresponsible character of Ernest, who was pictured as evil by Cecily. This was the only negative side I found in Jack. I knew it was wrong, it was hypocrite, yet I could understand how distressing it might be for Jack to always be perfectly serious and responsible. Sometimes people need to be careless, to do whatever he wants, and don’t have to think about the consequences.

[source]


Other than that, Jack was a patient man. I can’t imagine how he could befriend with the reckless and immoral Algernon without hating him or loosing his temper—well he might have lost his temper once, but it did not bring him to break his friendship with Algy. I also found Jack to be a tender hearted man, for when he—in front of Algernon—said bad things upon Lady Bracknell who has insulted him, he apologized to Algy because he did not want to hurt his feelings. 

Later when Gwendolen (his girlfriend) and Cecily knew the truth about the never-existed Ernest, Jack gallantly admitted that he had deceived them, that he never had any brother, and brave enough to take the risks (of losing Gwendolen’s love). And despite of his eagerness to take Gwendolen to become his wife, Jack spoke the truth about his rather humiliating history (being found in a handbag in a public place) to Lady Bracknell. He never felt ashamed of his life, and has the courage to take any risks, to be able to marry the girl he loved. That was the quality of a man which I always love!

If I can choose between the original Jack and Ernest, I would pick Jack. The real Jack who did not like the glamorous of Victorian social life like theatre or clubs; Jack who—although sometimes told lies (hey…don’t we all too?)—still had the courage to speak the truth when valuable and important things in life were the concerns.   


Monday, August 6, 2012

Classics Authors of August

Meski agak terlambat, aku tetap mau mengajak anda berkenalan dengan para penulis klasik yang lahir pada bulan Agustus. Di antara mereka banyak nama-nama besar seperti Leo Tolstoy, Guy de Maupassant dan Jorge Luis Borges. Mari simak kehidupan mereka, baik sebagai penulis maupun sebagai pribadi….

Herman Melville

Penulis Amerika bernama Herman Melville ini lahir pada 1 Agustus 1819 di New York City. Beliau adalah seorang novelis, selain penyair, penulis esai dan cerita pendek. Meski salah satu novelnya yang paling terkenal adalah Moby-Dick, namun Typee adalah novel pertamanya yang laris. Ayah Melville adalah seorang pedagang, namun setelah dua bisnisnya mundur lalu bangkrut, tak lama kemudian sang ayah meninggal, meninggalkan kemiskinan bagi keluarganya saat Melville berusia 12 tahun. Melville masuk akademi dan menyambi bekerja sebagai anak buah kapal. Pada 1841 Melville kembali berlayar selama 18 bulan ke Pasifik Selatan, dan belakangan mengaku hidupnya ‘dimulai’ pada saat itu. Kemungkinan banyak detail perjalanan itu ia tuangkan ke novel Moby-Dick yang berkisah tentang ikan paus.

Tahun 1847 Melville menikah, kemudian selama 13 tahun sibuk mengurus pertaniannya sambil terus menulis. Di pertanian itu pula ia berteman dengan penulis klasik besar lainnya Nathaniel Hawthore, yang tinggal tak jauh dari situ. Bahkan Melville mendedikasikan Moby-Dick untuk Hawthorne. Namun buku Melville yang berjudul Pierre tidak mendapat sambutan baik, malah ia dicap sebagai ‘gila’ di surat kabar. Di akhir perjalanan karirnya, keadaan keuangan Melville bertambah parah, dan ketika itu perkawinannya goyah, ditambah dengan kematian putranya yang menembak diri sendiri (kemungkinan kecelakaan).

Guy de Maupassant

Henri RenĂ© Albert Guy de Maupassant, atau dikenal dengan Guy de Maupassant terkenal sebagai penulis Prancis abad ke 19. Ia dianggap sebagai ‘Bapak’ penulisan cerita pendek modern. Karya-karyanya kebanyakan diwarnai nuansa Franco-Prussian War, dan salah satu karya terbesarnya adalah Ball of Fat selain Mademoiselle Fifi. Beliau lahir 5 Agustus 1850 dari keluarga borjuis kaya yang tinggal di chateau (rumah besar bak istana ala Prancis). Ketika Maupassant berusia 11 tahun, orangtuanya bercerai, dan ia tinggal bersama ibunya yang suka membaca karya klasik terutama Shakespeare. Maka tak heran jika pada usia 13 tahun Maupassant dikirim ke seminari untuk belajar klasik.

Pada usia 18 tahun Maupassant sempat menyelamatkan  Algernon Charles Swinburne, seorang penyair terkenal, yang nyaris tenggelam. Ia juga kemudian berkenalan dengan Gustave Flaubert, penulis klasik terkenal asal Prancis juga, yang kemudian mengambilnya menjadi anak angkat sekaligus semacam pelindung literatur Maupassant, dan membimbingnya memasuki dunia literasi. Di rumah Flaubert lah Maupassant sempat berjumpa dengan Émile Zola dan Ivan Turgenev. Flaubert memuji Ball of Fat sebagai "a masterpiece that will endure". Gabungan antara bakat menulis dan kemampuan bisnis dengan cepat membuat Maupassant kaya. Salah satu novelnya yang paling terkenal adalah Bel-Ami. Di akhir hidupnya Maupassant mengalami ketakutan akan kematian dan ingin menyendiri. Ia mencoba bunuh diri namun gagal, dan akhirnya menjadi salah satu penghuni paling terkenal sebuah rumah sakit jiwa di Paris, di mana Maupasant akhirnya menghembuskan napas terakhirnya.

Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings

Lahir pada 8 Agustus 1896 di Washington D.C., Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings kelak dikenal sebagai penulis klasik wanita yang memperoleh penghargaan Pulitzer pada tahun 1939 lewat karyanya The Yearling (diterjemahkan Gramedia). Rawlings sudah menunjukkan minat menulis sejak usia 6 tahun, ia sering mengirimkan tulisannya ke surat kabar di bagian anak-anak hingga usia 16 tahun. Setelah menikah, Rawlings membeli tanah pertanian di Cross Creek, Florida dari warisan yang ia terima dari ibunya, dan lokasi itu kelak menjadi setting novel-novelnya yang terkenal. Karyanya yang lain adalah Cross Creek dan The Sojourner.

Pada tahun 1943 Rawlings dituntut oleh sahabatnya atas tuduhan merusak privasi karena menulis tentang putra sang sahabat di kisah Jacob’s Ladder. Setelah kasus itu selesai Rawlings meninggalkan Cross Creek selamanya dan tak pernah lagi menulis tentang wilayah itu. Dengan uang hasil penjualan The Yearling, Rawlings akhirnya membeli cottage di tepi pantai di St. Agustine, di mana ia tinggal bersama suami keduanya, dan akhirnya meningal dunia pada 1953.

Sir Walter Scott

Walter Scott adalah penulis asal Skotlandia yang lahir pada 15 Agustus 1771. Beliau banyak menulis novel sejarah, naskah drama dan puisi, dan menjadi penulis Inggris pertama yang merasakan ketenaran yang mendunia di saat hidupnya. Ivanhoe dan Rob Roy adalah dua di antara novel-novel terkenalnya. Scott lahir di Edinburgh, dan pada usia 2 tahun berhasil bertahan dari penyakit polio, yang setelahnya membuatnya sedikit cacat pada kaki. Untuk menyembuhkan cacatnya, Scott dikirim ke desa tempat kakeknya tinggal. Di sana neneknya mengajari Scott membaca dongeng dan legenda, yang kelak menjadi dasar karyanya. Pada usia 12 tahun Scott sudah mulai belajar klasik di universitas.

Sejak muda Scott selalu tertarik pada dongeng-dongeng Skotlandia yang dituturkan secara verbal (story teller). Ia terobsesi untuk mengumpulan dongeng-dongeng itu. Di usia 25 tahun ia mulai menulis secara professional, kemudian menerbitkan tiga set kumpulan dongeng koleksinya. Inilah pertanda awal minatnya terhadap sejarah Skotlandia. Tahun 1825 terjadi krisis perbankan, dan perusahaan penerbitan ke mana Scott menginvestasikan uangnya jatuh bangkrut, dan Scott pun jatuh miskin. Ak mau mengaku bangkrut, Scott menjaminkan rumahnya pada kreditor dan bertekad akan terus menulis novel serta biografi Napoleon Bonaparte untuk keluar dari hutang, namun sayang kesehatannya memburuk, dan akhirnya  meninggal. Untunglah, novel-novelnya terjual terus hingga akhirnya mampu melunasi seluruh hutangnya.

Edith Nesbit

Terkenal dengan nama E. Nesbit, Edith Nesbit—kemudian menjadi Edith Bland setelah menikah—adalah penulis 60 buku anak-anak dan puisi asal Inggris. Lahir tanggal 15 August 1858, Nesbit menikah pada usia 22 tahun dengan Hubert Bland saat hamil tujuh bulan, pernikahan yang kemudian terbukti membawa petaka. Bland ketahuan berselingkuh dan menghamili sahabat Nesbit dan seorang wanita lain yang mengaku tunangan Bland. Nesbit bertengkar hebat dengan suaminya namun tetap bersedia mengadopsi kedua bayi wanita itu.

Beberapa novel terkenalnya antara lain The Railway Children (diterjemahkan Gramedia) didedikasikan untuk putra tertuanya, serta The Enchanted Castle (diterjemahkan Atria). Nesbit disebut-sebut sebagai penulis modern pertama untuk buku anak-anak, yang mengubah tradisi literasi anak warisan dari Lewis Carroll, George MacDonald dan Kenneth Graham. Menggabungkan kisah anak-anak kontemporer yang bersetting dunia nyata dengan obyek-obyek sihir, Nesbit berpengaruh dalam era penulis kisah anak-anak modern setelahnya seperti Diana Wynne Jones, J. K. Rowling dan C. S. Lewis.

Jorge Luis Borges

Jorge Francisco Isidoro Luis Borges, atau yang biasa kita kenal sebagai Jorge Luis Borges lahir pada 24 Agustus 1899 di Buenos Aires, Argentina. Borges adalah penulis cerita pendek, esai dan puisi serta penerjemah. Beberapa karyanya yang terkenal adalah Ficciones, Labyrinths dan The Aleph, yang merupakan komplilasi cerita pendek yang dihubungkan dengan tema serupa, antara lain mimpi, labirin, perpustakaan, agama, Tuhan, dsb. Karyanya masuk ke genre literatur filosofis maupun fantasi. Pada usia 9 tahun Borges sudah menerjemahkan The Happy Prince karya Oscar Wilde ke bahasa Spanyol.

Pada thn. 1938 ayah Borges, yang amat dekat dengannya, meninggal dunia dan mendatangkan tragedi baginya. Natal tahun itu Borges mengalami cedera kepala parah yang nyaris merenggut nyawanya. Setelah peristiwa itu, Borges mulai menerapkan gaya baru dalam menulis yang kelak membuatnya terkenal. Ketika penglihatannya mulai kabur sebelum berusia 30 tahun dan Borges tak mampu menulis lagi, ia menapaki karir baru sebagai ‘public lecturer’. Pada akhir thn 1950 Borges akhirnya buta total, kemudian meninggal dunia karena kanker liver pada 1986.

Mary Shelley

30 Agustus 1797 merupakan tanggal kelahiran seorang penulis wanita asal Inggris yang bernama lengkap Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, namun yang kelak lebih dikenal sebagai Mary Shelley. Selain sebagai penulis novel (novel paling terkenalnya adalah kisah gothic Frankenstein—diterjemahkan Gramedia), Shelley juga penulis cerita pendek, naskah drama, esai, biografi dan kisah perjalanan. Shelley dibesarkan oleh ayahnya, dan saat berusia 17 tahun ia memiliki hubungan romantic dengan pengikut politik ayahnya—Percy Bisshe Shelley—yang sudah menikah. Shelley mengandung bayi Percy, namun sayangnya dalam dua tahun pasangan ini menghadapi pengucilan, belitan hutang dan kematian bayi prematur mereka. Mereka baru menikah thn 1816 setelah istri Percy bunuh diri.

Ide menulis Franskenstein tiba saat pasangan baru ini menghabiskan musim panas di Swiss. Lalu pada 1822 Percy mati tenggelam ketika perahu yang dinaikinya tenggelam dalam badai. Setelah itu Shelley memutuskan untuk mengabdikan hidup untuk membesarkan putra semata wayang mereka dan menekuni penulisan profesional. Sayangnya di usia 53 Shelley harus menghadapi ajal akibat tumor otak yang selama decade terakhir hidupnya terus menggerogotinya.

Karya siapa yang akan and abaca bulan ini?


Thursday, August 2, 2012

Aramis on Twenty Years After: Character Thursday (22)


For me, Aramis is always the most intriguing character among the four musketeers. It’s not easy to describe his personal character; if you were asked, what kind of man Aramis is, well…it’s quite difficult to answer in one short sentence. May I just say that Aramis has a flamboyant character? Nevertheless, I am trying to describe him as best as I could, from what I have learned from Twenty Years After and The Man In The Iron Mask (I did not mention Three Musketeers because I did not find the characters being much revealed in that book).

Aramis was described by d’Artagnan as an elegant man with beautiful black hair, elegant figure and lady’s hands. I wonder..has he a handsome and attractive face too? Certainly, for if not, how can all the women got attracted to him easily? :) I noticed in this book, that Aramis often produce that mysterious smile of him, that I suspected to be his main weapon to steal women’s heart….

Do you find Luke Evans to well represent Aramis?



Unlike d’Artagnan, Aramis’ service for the Kingdom was not pure devotion. He is an ambitious man with his own purposes. We can say Aramis has a high ego, and always act for his own interest. However, his true ambition is not quite clear either; it seems that Aramis was always torn between his desire to serve the Church, and to become a chevalier. It’s interesting to look upon d’Artagnan’s comment about his friend:

I am thinking, my dear fellow, that when you were a musketeer you were forever becoming the abbé, and now you are an abbé you appear to me to have a strong leaning to the musketeers.

And what was Aramis’ answer to that?

That is true. Man is a strange creature, made up of contrasts. Since I have been an abbĂ© I dream only of battles.”

But the contrast—as he said himself—is not only that. No matter how often he was called as the AbbĂ© D’Herblay, I can never picture him as an abbĂ©. On the contrary, I always see Aramis as a womanizer. He has made a lot of affair with charming duchess and noble ladies (even when he was already an abbĂ©!). -Also, I have never seen him in any occasion act as an abbĂ©, there is no preaching-like in his words; in short…there is not any indication that can lead us to imagine Aramis as an abbĂ©. His lifestyle, for example, is far from the humble qualities we usually find in God’s servant.

Here’s d’Artagnan observation on Aramis’ bedroom,

He (d’Artagnan) had never seen a room at the same time more warlike and more elegant. At each corner were trophies of arms… It is true that in addition there was nothing to indicate the abode of an abbĂ©; the hangings were damask, the carpets came from Alençon, and the bed especially seemed more fit for an elegant lady, with its lace hangings and its counterpane, than for a man who had taken a vow to gain heaven by abstinence and hardship.



Aramis is a man of contradictory and he has a quality of kept hiding his interests in a mask of calm and noble man that he often wears. I remember from The Man In The Iron Mask, d’Artagnan felt that Aramis must have been planning something big, but he could never guessed anything. When Aramis said anything, I can’t but thinking, does he really mean that? Or what he’s really up to?

Although he has a noble taste, but his heart is far from being noble. Aramis is an ambitious man, who always thinks of himself and his interest. How he could always keep his friendship with the three other musketeers, I can’t imagine. Among the bound of their friendship, I think, Aramis’s part is the weakest.

One interesting thing from The Three Musketeers, is the love affair Aramis had with Madame de Chevreuse. Later in the Twenty Years After, I learned that Madame de Chevreuse, in her exile, has had a one-night love affair with Athos. This is one thing Aramis never knew about his former lover, ah yes…in Twenty Years After he has found a new lover, Madame de Longueville :). Can you imagine what he would think or say, if he gets to reveal who Raoul’s mother is?....



That is my Character Thursday of this week, an analysis of book character of my choice, who is yours?... Just put your post URL in the linky below. Do you like to join us in discussing characters from books you read? See the details of Character Thursday first.