Jarndyce and
Jarndyce was a legal case with a long history in the Chancery court. It's about
a conflicting wills which affected many people of several generations and
ruined many of its suitors’ lives because of the corrupted law system. Of the
many victims are John Jarndyce, the owner of Bleak House, the two orphaned
cousins Richard Carstone and Ada Clare, and Lady Honoria Dedlock. Together with
another orphan girl which became John Jarndyce's ward: Esther Summerson, they
become the leading characters of this book.
Dickens wove
the story using voices of two narrators with different character: Esther
Summerson's—calm and reserved, and the omniscient—rather cold and severe. This
makes Bleak House less dull, but still
I missed Dickens' warm and affectionate voice he used in several books I have
read so far.
Unlike his
other books, Bleak House was built by
several plots or subplots which are often unrelated to each other, but for the
(abundant) characters. The Jellybys and the Turveydrops, for example, are not
really related to the others, except Caddy Jellyby who are so fond of Esther
Summerson. Is it only Dickens's way to highlight Esther's amiable and unselfish
character? But what about the Dedlocks? Lady Dedlock is another prominent
character here, but although she was also suitor in the Jarndyce vs Jarndyce,
her part is not related to the law suit; which made me thinking what purpose
does she really bring to us, reader?
Speaking of
Lady Dedlock, she has become my favorite character of this book. From the
moment she went to the burial ground, disguised, guided by poor Jo, I have said
to myself: here is a brave, strong, smart woman with a steely determination
underneath her elegant bearing. Compared to Esther Summerson or John Jarndyce,
Lady Dedlock seems more humane, and thus more prominent. For a distinguished
lady who had a dark past, how she could bear it bravely alone… that’s the real
heroine to me. Esther and, especially, John Jarndyce are almost like fairytale’s
character. Can one be THAT unselfish and always perfectly kind like Jarndyce? I
would have loved him to be selfish, at least when his love was concerned, but
for his lover’s happiness, he’d reluctantly give way to the man she really loves.
That would be much acceptable. But, it’s Dickens anyway, and despite all that, Bleak House was loveable and memorable.
Oh, I forgot
to mention Harold Skimpole, who, to me, was the WORST antagonist of all time!
How can that kind of person ever exists in the world, I can’t imagine. Well,
enough for the rants... I would have given Bleak
House five stars just for Lady Dedlock’s sub-plot. The search by Inspector
Bucket and Esther is so thrilling. And I could see whence Hercule Poirot’s
investigating style was inspired—his casual talking to extract facts
innocently, his systematic pattern of search (and his cool way to do it), and the
way he confront the accused by shaking his/her emotion in front of others. Now,
that part deserves five stars, but Esther’s narrative and the Jarndyce and Jarndyce
are rather dull and unreal. 4,5 of 5 is my best compromise.
This one is still sitting on my shelf...waiting...I'm a little intimidated to begin it. Your score is encouraging, but I don't know about those dull parts. Hmm...
ReplyDeleteMaybe "dull" is too extreme; let me replace it with "reserved". It's not that that part is not interesting, but the way the narrator putting it, I believe, is too calm. But the investigation part helps to spice it up. Maybe it's not my favorite, but still a good and strong book from Dickens. Hopefully you are encouraged enough to read it next year. :)
DeleteI still plan to read it -- I have another friend who encourages me to read it -- but I don't think I will read it in 2018. Even though I've read several other Dickens, which are not my favorites, I am still grateful to have read them. So I know it will be worth it.
Delete