I have
actually watched this 2009 computer animated motion-capture adaptation of
Dickens’ A Christmas Carol last December, but unfortunately I haven’t got
chance to review it. So, I replayed my DVD last weekend, and after having lightly
browsed the story from my ebook reader to refresh my memory, here’s what I
thought about the movie….
What I love
most from it, is the setting. The 19th century London is vividly portrayed
in the film, as if we are taken into a stroll on the streets, sensing the
Christmas spirits around in the cold snowy days as well as nights. I might say
that Robert Zemeckis has carefully put small details of what we might have seen
from that century every where in this film, including the costumes. And apart
from the motion-capture, the setting itself is very vividly captured!
The main
characters are also portrayed perfectly (I guess this is the advantage of
making animated film, you can create the characters as similar as possible with
the book). Ebenezer Scrooge is “scrooge” enough for making others feel
the rush of cold sweeping whenever he’s passing by. Fred the nephew is
enthusiastic and gay enough to annoy his uncle. Bob Cratchit is melancholy
enough to be the poor staff with a big heart for his family. And of course,
Tiny Tim is “saint” enough to be the angelic child (seems that Dickens could
never resist the temptation to create such angelic child in his tales…).
Now let us
talk about the ghost and Scrooge’s encounter with the three of them: of Christmas
Past, of Christmas Present, and a Christmas Yet To Come. The Christmas Past ghost
might be my favorite, because it does not look like a ghost at all :). The Christmas
Present is cheerful enough with his red and green costumes, but I don’t quite
like his too-often-laughs which I don’t think appear in the book. And his departure
is rather weird, I think…. As for the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come, the dark
hooded shadow gives a chill reflection all right, but unfortunately Zemeckis
was trapped in the typical Hollywood to create a black carriage to chase
Scrooge and to make Scrooge shrink to a mouse size. As if every movie must have
a suspense effect to catch audiences…. *sigh*
All in all,
this is one of the most satisfying classics movie adaptations I have ever
watched so far. Two thumbs up and 8.5 to 10 is my generous rating for it.
Although it’s still far from Christmas, I can’t resist to borrow Tiny Tim’s
greeting to end this review—just as he ended the book—God bless us, everyone!
~~~~~~~
Hey, I saw this when I was 15 at the local drive-in (which has since shut down...D:). It was such a good adaptation. :)
ReplyDeleteYep, a satisfying one!
DeleteHi Fanda,
ReplyDeleteI loved this version very much, and feel tempted now to watch it again. I cansider it the best adaptation so far.
I haven't watched any other adaptation, but I agree that this one reflects Dickens' work very well.
DeleteThis is the version I watched last year and I rather liked it. I thought the first half was particularly good at keeping to the story. But there are a lot of versions I haven't seen yet, and so I haven't chosen a favorite.
ReplyDeleteI like how the movie presented the 19th century London atmosphere.
DeleteI like the movies too :D but when I read the book, there's something different I sense in this story, I might re-watched it again later :D
ReplyDeleteOne of the most successful books-into-movies, eh?
Delete